依類型 族群 主題   
 
 
2007.06.01 ~ 2008.06.01
地理資訊系統檢測全民造林地問題之意見調查與分析-以台東縣原住民鄉為例
族群: 跨族群  
主題: 環境生態保育、學術研究  
作者 邱俊彥
學校系所 屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作系所
地點 台東縣 全部    
研究內容

[ 摘要 ]

1996年至2003年推行大規模全民造林運動,由於相關造林檢測工作部份不落實所引起諸多的弊端,進而影響計畫之推展,因而行政院於2004停止辦理此一獎勵造林政策。臺東縣政府2006年率先應用地理資訊系統(GIS)辦理造林地檢測作為改善問題之工具,並推展至全縣所屬各鄉(鎮、市)公所,用以確認造林面積、界址及現場林相成活率等項目。本研究即是調查台東縣政府所轄七個原住民鄉的原住民林主及鄉公所業務承辦主管、承辦及造林檢測員,對於運用地理資訊系統作為全民造林地檢測工具之意見。



經研究分析,結果在抽樣268人原住民林主與26位承辦人員之調查意見上顯示相當一致。在現有林業機關施行措施頂目上,82.1%的林主與76.9%的承辦人員均表示以提供免費苗木最好。在林業政策執行認知上,皆以領取獎勵金需求為優先,53.0%的林主建議提高獎勵金第一年每公頃新植20萬,第二至六年每年6萬,七至廿年每年5萬;57.7%的承辦人員對獎勵金額則建議較中肯,以第一年每公頃新植15萬,第二至六年每年5萬,七至廿年每年4萬。在林業政策宣導頂目上,74.6%的林主及76.9%的承辦人員均認為以辦理講習會較具成效。整體而言,雖然有81.7%的林主以及65.4%的承辦人員對全民造林政策並不滿意,然而對於運用地理資訊系統作為檢測工具,有70.2%的林主與80.8%的承辦人員均表示相信,且認為若被系統檢測出問題,70.9%的林主與76.9%的承辦人員也願意配合政府改善。因此,對於運用該系統,僅有6.7%的林主與7.7%的承辦人員表示不滿意,顯示運用地理資訊系統可作為改善全民造林政策之良好工具。



[ 英文摘要 ]

A national scale reforestation movement was preceed between 1996 and 2003, but many problems occurred as a result of imappropriate inspections of reforestation results and created a negative impact on the implementation of the project. In consequence, the Executive Yuan terminated the reforestation subsidization program in 2004. Taitung County and its township level offices became the first to employ the Geographical Information System (GIS) as a problem-solving tool in 2006. It conducted reforestation inspections through confirmation of reforested areas, their boundaries as well as the seedling survival rates, etc. This study is targeting at Taitung County’s aboriginal forest owners in the seven aboriginal townships participating in this project and the ruling officials, responsible personnel and reforestation inspectors of aboriginal township offices to survey their opinions of using the GIS as a inspection tool for reforestation inspections.



The research showed the similar result between the 268 forest owners and 26 responsible personnel from random sampling. For the present practices of forestry agencies, 82.1% of forest owners and 76.9 % of responsible personnel deemed provision of free seedlings as the most important. For the forestry policy awareness, they approved that acquiring government subsidies was the top priority. 53.0 % of the forest owners suggesed the subsidies to be raised to NTD200,000 per hectare of new plants in the first year, 60,000 per year between the second and the sixth years, and 50,000 between the 7th and the 20th. The suggestion from 57.7 % of the responsible personnel was modesty. They recommended the subsidies to be raised to NTD150,000 per hectare of new plants for the initial year, 50,000 per year from the 2nd to the 6th year, and 40,000 per year between the 7th and the 20th years. For promulgating forestry policies, 74.6 % of forest owners and 76.9 % of responsible personnel agreed that exhibit workshops was the best approach. Overall,81.7% of forest owners and 65.4% of responsible personnel were not satisfied with the policy of national reforestation. Nevertheless, 70.2% of forest owners and 80.8% of responsible personnel had confidence in employing Geographical Information System (GIS) as a inspection tool. 70.9 % of forest owners and 76.9% of responsible personnel expressed willingness to cooperate with the government to rectify the defect inspected by the information system. Howerver, only 6.7% of forest owners and 7.7% of responsible personnel were not satisfied with the system. Obviously, Geographical Information System (GIS) is a useful tool for improving the policy of reforestation.