[ 摘要 ]

本研究目的在暸解國內運動員心理技能現況，探討不同背景變項與不同技能水準運動員在心理技能表現之差異情形，並進一步運用心理技能各量表得分對技能水準進行區別分析。本研究運動員心理技能量表係依據(邱玉惠，2001）以ACSI-28 為藍本，所編製的量表為研究工具；以參加2007年全國運動會之運動員為研究對象，採立意及便利取樣，選取490名運動員進行問卷填答，有效問卷共計476份（男生291人、女生185人）。以描述性統計、獨立樣本二因子多變量變異數分析及區別分析進行假設檢定，所有統計考驗之顯著水準（α）定為.05。

本研究範圍所得結論如下：

一、 運動員在心理技能量表中各分量得分高低依序為「可教導性」、「動機」、「壓力處理與逆境調適」、「專注」及「自信心」。

二、 技能水準與競賽類別及家中排行等兩個背景變項之間交互作用效果達顯著水準；技能水準與性別、年齡、訓練時間、競賽項目、是否受過心理技能訓練等背景變項的交互作用效果則未達顯著水準；技能水準與技能分類、血型、是否為原住民等三個背景變項之交互作用及主要效果的比較皆未達顯著水準。

三、 第一區別函數在五個心理技能上能有效區別不同技能水準之運動員，各級運動員正確預測率如下：「第一級」60.9％，「第二級」31.2％，「第三級」39.2％，全體總預測率為49.4％，足見預測變項對於不同技能水準運動員之區別力尚不足，但對於「第一級」的預測正確率60.9％，則有其參考價值。



[ 英文摘要 ]

The purposes of the study were to realize the applications of athletes’ psychological skills in our country and explore the psychological influences on athletes with dfferent backgrounds and skill levels. Furthermore, it analyzed the skill levels by the scores of the psychological skills table. The measurement in this study originated from ACSI-28 (Chiou, yu-hui, 2001) was improved to fit to athletes in our country. The study subjects were the athletes attending the national athletic game in 2007. There were 476 valid samples from the 490 athletes chosen intentionally and randomly (male 291, female 185). The data processing included：the descriptive statistics,discriminant statistics and two-way MANOVA to examine the hypothesis of the study, with significane level set at p<.05. The results of this study were the following below:

1. The numbers ranked in descending order from the psychological skills tables filling out by athletes were coach ability, motivation, pressure management and adversity adjustment, concentration and confidence.

2. The skill levels can be affected by the types of contest and the ranking of all siblings respectively. The influences of sex, age, training time, contest types, and psychological skills being trained or not on the skill levels were not so obvious. The skill levels didn’t have clear interaction between the skill classification, blood types, and being aborigines or not.

3. The first discriminant function could distinguish between the skill levels of athletes on five psychological skills. The anticipation rate of the first class athletes was 60.9%. The second class was 31.2%. The third class was 49.4%. It was not efficient for the variables to distinguish between different skill levels athletes. In conclusion, the “first class” showed good anticipation of 60.9%;therefore , it was worth consulting.