|
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
原住民的報紙新聞再現─以花蓮縣長補選期間「殺豬涉賄選」爭議為例 The Representation of Indigenous Peoples in the Press: A Case of Controversial “Pig-Killing Bribery”
|
|
|
| 作者 |
 |
林惠娟 |
| 學校系所 |
|
佛光人文社會學院傳播學研究所 |
| 地點 |
|
全臺 全部
|
| 研究內容 |
|
[ 摘要 ]
本研究運用van Dijk的新聞論述分析方法，以中國時報、自由時報、聯合報、蘋果日報等國內四家主流報紙為分析文本，藉由2003年花蓮縣長補選期間引發的「殺豬涉賄選」爭議事件的分析，來探究原住民相關報導的新聞再現。
本研究從媒介建構社會真實的觀點出發，以Foucault的權力觀為基礎，欲回答以下問題：國內主流媒介如何再現殺豬涉賄選爭議事件？媒介中發言者的論述角逐情形如何？四報反映了何種意識型態？從此三面向探討主流媒介再現原住民相關新聞的情形。
研究結果發現，主流報紙媒介對於殺豬涉賄事件的再現分別是：「政治目的的聚焦」、「漢人邏輯的再現」、「原民弱勢的凸顯」。在此新聞事件中的發言著除了報社記者編輯，不外乎政界、學界、警界、原住民甚至宗教界等菁英，各自透過不同觀點的論述形構，將自身立場合理化，並削弱對方論點。四報對此爭議事件的報導也有些許異同，雖然在論述中可見對原住民的關懷，但整體份量仍嫌不足，四報多篇報導論述內容不免隱含著漢人沙文主義與霸權心態，原住民常成為論述中的他者。
媒體在建構原住民相關新聞時與台灣的社會文化價值是息息相關的，因此，媒體在報導新聞事件或評論事件時，並不是站在客觀事實上的認定，而是參雜了許多外在因素的主觀建構，這些正是整個社會長期存在的意識型態。大眾媒介在處理原住民議題時，可能隨著原住民族群意識逐漸甦醒而有所改善，但整體仍採取一種壓抑的社會控制角色，甚至將原住民視為他者，或擠向邊緣，不因不同報紙而發展出比起漢人而更有利於原住民的社會位置，這些新聞建構本身就是社會既存的社會價值和規範。
[ 英文摘要 ]
Based on Van Dijk’s method for news discourse analysis, this study analyzes the text with the four biggest newspapers in Taiwan including the China Times, Liberty Times, United Daily News, and the Apple Daily. By means of an analysis of “Pig-killing bribery”, which is a controversial affair occurred in the Hualien Country magistrate by-lection in 2003, we propose the representation of the relevant news reports for the indigenous peoples.
This study aims at view for social reality construction and bases on Foucault’s notion of power to respond to the following questions: How did the local main media represent the controversial pig-killing affair? What was the situation in the media spokesmen’s discussions and contests against each other? What kind of ideologies did the four newspapers adopt? From the three aspects we discuss the main media’s representation for the indigenous peoples.
This study found that the representations of the main newspapers media for the pig-killing affair are: “the focusing on political purpose”, “the representation of Hans logic”, and “the exposure of disadvantaged indigenous peoples”. Other than the newspapers editors, there were spokesmen from the elites of politics, academics, police, indigenous peoples, or even religion. They rationalized their standpoints with their individual discursive formation and weakened the other’s standpoints. Though the four newspapers share some coherent thoughts for this controversial affair in regard to the indigenous peoples-caring, the proportion is rather small and those reports are involved with state of chauvinism and hegemony, which often lead the indigenous peoples to become the others .
The correlation between indigenous peoples-related news and Taiwan’s social culture value is closely bound up so that when the media write for news they rarely ground on objective facts but mingle with many subjective construction from the external factors, which is the typical ideology long existing in the society. The ways media handle the issues of indigenous people might be enhanced in the wake of indigenous peoples’ racial awareness. Yet, the mass media still act in a constrained social controlling manner; as some even treat the indigenous peoples as the others or push them to the limit; so the variety of newspapers reporting didn’t help the indigenous peoples in raising their social status than the Hans period. The newspapers construction itself is the existing values and norms of the society. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
