|
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
不同距離速度訓練對徑賽100m成績之影響 Effects of Different Distances’ Speed Training on 100m Performance
|
|
|
| 作者 |
 |
林佐吉 |
| 學校系所 |
|
國立臺灣體育大學(桃園)教練研究所 |
| 地點 |
|
全臺 全部
|
| 研究內容 |
|
[ 摘要 ]
本研究主要目的在探討以不同距離速度訓練對100m之影響。受試對象為18名男女徑賽選手，平均年齡12.3 ±2.46years、平均身高174.6±4.51cm、平均體重79.23±7kg kg、平均訓練年數1.3±1.1 year。以前側100m速度與CMJ成績，分為A組以30m訓練組(9人)和B組以60m訓練組(9人)；訓練時間為期四週，每週四次。所得資料以以SPSS for Windows10.0中文視窗版套裝軟體及Sigma 8.0統計軟體進行統計分析及製作圖形。以混合設計二因子變異數分析（組別x測試點）考驗組間與組內之差異。若達顯著差異，則進一步以杜凱氏HSD法進行事後比較，所得資料皆以平均數、標準差表示，並將差異性以圖表呈現以進行分析比較。顯著水準訂為 p＜0.05。
研究結論如下：
(一)經過四週不同距離速度訓練上有效提升A、B兩組下肢動力表現，A組30m訓練組優於B組60m訓練組。
(二)經過四週不同距離速度訓練上有效提升A、B兩組反應時間表現，各測試點都有顯著進步；整體測試A組優於B組。
(三)經過四週不同距離速度訓練上有效提升A、B兩組各速度能力表現，B組測試都優於A組。
(四)A、B兩組不同距離速度訓練，對於兩組組間之速度、下肢動力、反應時間，A組100m與下肢動力未達顯著相關；B組卻在A組T-2及A、B組間T-3達高度顯著相關，100m與反應時間(RT)三次測試各項能力達顯著進步，但未達顯著相關。
[ 英文摘要 ]
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of speed training of difference distance on 100m performance. Eighteen track athletes were involved this study with the average age, high, weight and training years were 12.3 ±2.46years, 174.6±4.51cm, 79.23±7kg, 1.3±1.1 years.Group A that was 30m training group involved 9 athletes and group B that was 60m training groups involved 9 athletes, athletes were assigned by 100m velocity and CMJ height.
Results and graphs of research were produced by SPSS for Windows10.0 and Sigma 8.0, respectively. The difference of intra-groups and inter-group was analyzed by mix design two-way ANOVA (group x time). Post Hoc were used by HSD when results of analysis had significant difference. Significant level was p＜0.05.
Conclusion of research followed below :
1. The performance of power of lower power of group A and B had both progress that group A was better than Group B after 4 weeks training.
2. The performance of reactive time of group A and B had both progress that group A was better than Group B after 4 weeks training.
3. The performance of power of lower power of group A and B had both progress that group A was better than Group B after 4 weeks training.
4. The speed, power of lower body and reactive time between groups didn’t had significant correlation ; Group B had high significant correlation with T-2,T-3 of group A, 100m and reactive time had significant progress, but don’t have significant correlation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
