依類型 族群 主題   
 
 
2002.06.01 ~ 2004.06.01
花蓮縣新社部落噶瑪蘭人之人體測量學與膚紋學研究
族群: 噶瑪蘭族 、跨族群  
主題: 學術研究  
作者 賴俊宏
學校系所 慈濟大學人類學研究所
地點 花蓮縣 豐濱鄉    
研究內容

中心館藏網址 http://tulips.ntu.edu.tw/record=b2168027*cht

[ 摘要 ]
體質的表現會隨著血統的改變而改變,現在不從事族群體質人類學的調查和研究,以後的難度會數倍於現在,因此立即從事新社村體質的調查是刻不容緩的。 本研究所使用的材料有兩類,第一類是本研究的主要材料,實地測量的新社新社部落噶瑪蘭人的體質資料男性48人,女性56人;第二類是已發表過的測量資料,有翟振剛於1968發表過的台灣本島各族原始測量資料及散見於國立台灣大學醫學院解剖學研究室論文集、國立台灣大學考古人類學學報及人類學雜誌等相關期刊雜誌的亞洲地區族群的測量值。 在統計上是用歐氏平方根距離係數(Euclidean Square Root Distance coefficient)來做多項目的併合,以計算該兩族群之間的差異程度。聚類分析時(cluster analysis)採用Neighbor joining方法來繪製親緣關係樹。研究結論如下 1.台灣住民體質上的聚類關係離華南地區較近,和華北地區較遠,且中國北部族群間的差異很大。 2.台灣住民可分為三種群聚,分別是台灣原住民主體群、非原住民主體群、阿美族。 3.台灣原住民主體群以泰雅族、布農族、賽夏族為主要代表,並包含卑南族、排灣族、魯凱族、鄒族、邵族、太魯閣族及雅美族。 4.非原住民主體群以大社平埔族、頭社平埔族、左鎮平埔族為主要代表,並包含萬巒平埔族、赤山平埔族、新港平埔族、烏牛欄平埔族、羅東平埔族及福佬、客家在內。 5.阿美族各地方群自成一群。膚紋部分和新社部落相近;生體部份則否。 6.新社部落和中國北部族群、台灣住民都保持有一些差距。但新社在這兩聚類間還是比較靠近台灣住民這個群聚。 7.新社部落和羅東平埔族雖僅約兩百年的各自發展,但體質上已呈現相當程度的差異。 8.對於新社部落生體及膚紋所呈現的聚類關係,除混血的影響外,具有親屬關係的人群遷移來組成新社部落可能也是造成新社部落是台灣住民間外群的原因之一。

[ 英文摘要 ]
The expression of constitute changes with the change in breed. If the ethnic constitute anthropological investigation and research were not conducted now, it would be times more difficult in the future. It is therefore imperative to conduct investigation Shinshe Village Citizen Constitute immediately. The materials used in this Research are comprised of two types. The first one, the main part of this research, the field measure of the constitute data of Gamalanian of Shinshe Tribe of Shinshe of 48 male and 58 female. The second one is published measuring data, including the Tribal Original Measuring Data of Taiwan published in 1968 by Mr. Chai Cheng-kang and other collections of papers of Anatomy Research Office of Medical School of National Taiwan University, Bulletin of Department of Anthropology and Archaeology and other Anthropological Magazines related to the measuring data of tribes in Asian Region. Statistically, Euclidean Square Root Distance Coefficient is applied to make combination and integration of various items to calculate the level of difference between the two tribes. In Cluster Analysis used Neighbor Joining method to depict relationship trees. The conclusions of the research are as the following: 1. The cluster relationship of constitutes of peoples on Taiwan is closer to people of Southern China and less close than Northern China area, and the difference between the tribes in Northern China. 2. People on Taiwan may be categorized into 3 clusters, namely Taiwan Indigenous Inhabitants mains, Non-Indigenous Inhabitant mains and Ami Tribe. 3. Taiwan Indigenous Inhabitants Mains constitutes of Atayal, Bunun and Saisiat are the representing ones, and also included are Puyuma, Paiwan, Rukai, Tsou, Taroko and Yami. 4. Non Indigenous Inhabitant Mains are represented mainly Pinpu tribes of Tash, Toushe, Chuochen, and also included are Pinpu Tribe of Waanluan, Chishan, Shinkang, Wuniulan, Luotung and Hoklo and Hakka. 5. The clans of Ami Tribe in different places are each independent clans in the particular place. They have tattoo design closer to the Shinshe tribes, but in physical part is different. 6. Shinshe tribe maintains certain difference from tribes of northern China and Taiwan Indigenous inhabitants, but between them, Shinshe tribe is closer to Taiwan Indigenous Inhabitant than the clusters of the other part. 7. Shinshe tribe and Pinpu of Luotung were separated and developed independently for only about 200 years, but physically, there is substantial difference presented. 8. The cluster relationship displayed by Shinshe tribesmen physically and tattoo, in addition to mix blood, the lineage related cluster migrated and formed new clan may be one of the causes for Shinshe Tribe different from Taiwan Indigenous Inhabitants mains.