[ 摘要 ]

1930年代發生的霧社事件，是台灣史上最受矚目的原住民族反抗事件，從1930年至今，事件以各種方式存留於

人們記憶之中，長達七十多年的時光，史料的挖掘與詮釋持續進行，本論文以「霧社事件文本的記憶與認同研究」為題，考察文本中的霧社事件呈現了何種記憶內容，記憶所建構的認同圖像為何？

首先將霧社事件相關文本進行蒐集研究，以時代縱深為主軸，從集體記憶的角度切入，考察時代中的文本如何與文本中的時代進行對話，歷史書寫過去，也是現在，更指向未來，霧社事件在每個當代如何被記憶，記憶的操作空間、書寫如何呈現認同的形構與成員的邊界。

其次，從再現的政治觀察再現者的權力與再現的內容，過去戒嚴體制的國族論述與歷史記憶，民族主義與父權結構的結合，優勢族群與男性主導的記憶書寫，原住民如何被再現，歷史中的女性面貌為何，兩者的被再現反映了威權政治的單一視角與意識型態；八零年代以降民主運動興起與解嚴後，多元的聲音紛紛浮現，邊緣挑戰中心思維，批判歷史的詮釋霸權，女性、庶民、原住民等透過書寫或言說，解構大敘述以重建歷史主體，這些敘事結構影響了人們的經驗建構、也反映了族群認同的變遷與個人或群體間的利益與權力關係，霧社事件記憶文本的考察有助於我們了解不同主體如何透過記憶再現進行位置的挑戰與資源的競逐。

[ 英文摘要 ]

Ooshen Event(霧社事件), which happened in 1930, was known for the aborigines’ resistance in Taiwan history. Past events have been being within the memory of people from 1930s to now. Researches and interpretations about historical events have been exploring. This thesis entitled Textual Memory and Identifications in Ooshen Event focused on the ways that Ooshen Event represented and its graphic accounts.



First, the researcher collected texts, which were related to Ooshen Event, in order to examine the accounts in different ages. From the perspectives of collective memory, the researcher discussed the connections between texts and ages. All the things that happened in the past became history. What is happening now also makes history. History might be the references for future people. In different ages, people’s identifications with Ooshen Event would be influenced by the ways that it was recorded and remembered.



Second, the researcher observed that the representation in police again disclosed the relationship between power and written accords. Under martial law, national discourse and historical accords; nationalism and patriarchal society; superior ethnic and masculine writing re-emerged. How were aborigines depicted? Besides, how did historical records comment on female roles? The representations of aborigines and females in written accords, in fact, reflected the single voice and ideology under authoritarianism. However, multiple voices replaced the single voice after the movement of democraticism and the abolition of martial law. The critiques of hegemony; the discourses on females, common people, and aborigines not only deconstructed grand narratives but also reconstructed subjects’ status in history. Obviously, multiple voices had impacts on constructing people’s experiences. On the other hand, it revealed the changes of ethnic identifications and the relationship between interests and power. Focusing on the exploration of textual memory, the researcher hoped this study would help the reader understand how different subjects reconstructed their positions through the representation of memory.