[ 摘要 ]

對原住民文學的界定，本文乃採孫大川以編選之《台灣原住民族漢語文學選集》的身份血統為標準，並以原住民「自我身份認同」作為本文論述的基點。而原住民文學發展的分期，以原住民運動為分水嶺，原運之前的作品，由於政治與時代氛圍因素，本文將此時期定位為「同化、妥協期」；伴隨原運而生的作品，依其爭取原住民權益、族群之主體性為訴求的社會運動，本文定位為「控訴、抗爭期」；原運降溫，此時期的作品也轉以認同文化、重建歷史的多元面向，本文定位為「認同、回歸期」。本文試圖以台灣戰後原住民漢語文學之排灣族作家、作品為研究對象，探討分屬於不同時代、社會環境下的排灣族作家，其創作之心靈軌跡，以及對應於台灣社會關於原住民相關議題的辯證。

[ 英文摘要 ]

The definition of aboriginal literature adopted the identity and ancestry standard from 「Taiwanese Aboriginal Literature Anthology」 by Sun Da-chuan. Moreover、according to 「The recognition of identification」 of aborigine is the basis of this thesis、researcher adopted the aboriginal movement a divide. The works of aboriginal movement、researcher classifies the works as 「assimilation and compromise period」 due to the politics and the times. The works go along with aboriginal movement、and researcher classifies those as 「indictment and resistance period」 by the movements of fighting for aboriginal rights and interests and the subjectivity of the different Taiwanese aborigine. With the aboriginal movement goes down、the works of this period transform into multiple divisions of culture reorganizations and history rebuilding that was 「reorganizations and returns period.」 The subjects are the writer of Paiwan of aboriginal literature after the war of Taiwan. Discuss the different writers of Paiwan under the particular times and social environment、those mind trace of literary creation、and the dialectics which corresponds to Taiwanese social issues of aborigine.