依類型 族群 主題   
 
 
2004.06.01 ~ 2006.06.01
原住民地區共用資源保育與利用之分析─以新竹縣尖石鄉後山的泰雅族部落為例(Analysis of indigenous Conservation and Utilization on CPR:Two CPR Self Governing Cases of Atayal Tribe in Taiwan Indigenes)
族群: 泰雅族   
主題: 傳統生態智慧  
作者 孫稚堤(Sun,Chih-ti )
學校系所 國立政治大學地政研究所
地點 全臺 全部  
研究內容

[ 摘要 ]

從共用資源理論觀點暨公共選擇角度而言,原住民部落資源與傳統領域土地乃一「封閉式共用資源」,若由原住民部落團體共有並自主經營管理,社群內部將可能透過個體的合作,創造共同利益,發揮傳統生態知識、善用在地組織,避免原住民地權流失,並進一步達到資源永續發展的目的。但由於受限於「經濟人」與「國家理性主義」之假設,且忽視了人與自然資源會相互影響、相互限制的事實,人們常引用Hardin(1968)的「共用地悲劇」,指出共用資源必將陷於過度使用的危險之中,最終肇致環境的退化。

為釐清此議題,本研究以新竹縣尖石鄉後山兩個具有共用資源自主治理個案的泰雅族部落為例,選取現今既有的「部落地景」、「河川魚群」、「森林產物」等三種形式之共用資源進行觀察;在時間上則以這些資源在保育目的下被部落共同維持開始,到被賦予促進部落經濟期待後的發展為主要的範圍。以新制度經濟學為理論基礎,藉由實證調查和比較,並經「組織中的個人制度選擇」、「社會中的共管組織」以及「社會生態系統」等三個層面的分析,討論有哪些因素影響個人遵守集體的正式與非正式規範?群體如何制定符合當地條件的共用資源治理規範,並維持組織的長期存續?而社會與自然生態之間的互動關係又是如何形成?冀以探討影響「以部落為基礎的自然資源自主治理」之內外部因素及其互動關係,俾提供後續共用資源管理制度設計思考的基礎。

[ 英文摘要 ]

From the perspective of “common pool resources” (CPR) theory and public choices, the tribal resources of aboriginals and traditional territories are a “closed-access” type of common pool resources. If aboriginal tribes manage the CPR in a self-governing way, the communities may be able to, through the cooperation of individuals within, create collective interests, leverage traditional knowledge regarding the ecosystem, utilize local organizations in order to avoid the lapse of aboriginal land, and achieve the sustainable development of resources. However, people are limited to the hypotheses of “homo economicus” and “raison d’état” along with an overlook of the fact that mutual influences and restrictions lie between humans and natural resources. They often quote the essay “Tragedy of the Commons” by Hardin (1968), according to which common resources are under the constant threat of overuse that will eventually degrade the environment.

To establish clarity on this issue, this paper uses an Atayal county with two CPR self-governing cases to observe three types of common pool resources currently seen today: tribe landscape, river fish and forest produce. The time horizon starts at the time point when these resources were placed under tribal management for conservation purposes, and ends at the time point when these resources are expected to prompt economic development. This paper conducts empirical investigations and comparisons based on the theoretical foundations of new institutional economics, and analyzes three aspects of these issues: choice of personal systems within an organization, collective management organizations in a society, and Social-Ecological Systems (SESs). This paper discusses the factors that affect how individuals conform to social norms, formal and informal. How a public choice is made to design the rules which are proper to local CPR situation and maintains the organization long-term sustainability? How do the interactions between society and the natural ecosystem come into being? By exploring the internal and external factors of self-governance of natural resources by tribes and the resulting interactions, this paper aims to provide a foundation for subsequent studies in the design of the management systems for common resources.